|
My Buying Tendencies
Not all genres are created equal for each player. Some people will buy the game just for the sake of the genre. Others will buy games because of the nostalgic reasons.
|
|
I'm not the type of gamer that will play the game because it was the first to execute the genre or because it debuted before the Nintendo. I will play the game if it warrants replaying that same great experience. Being the older generation gamer that I am, I've lived through the Atari 2600, Magnavox Odyssey, Tournament 2000, etc. I've even owned and played hundreds of these games during its yesteryear. However, I won't even try to justify calling them classics. I barely find myself trying to play them. I just don't see how you can have fun moving an arrow around screen for hours to avoid other dots or red squares. If I feel like I will be only playing these games and consoles only in the front of others for the sake of nostalgic amazement, there is no reason to go back and play them again; much less buy them. A simple portrait of an Atari or a screenshot of Breakout would be enough to bring me back. I also don't play many games based on movie or anime licenses. As much as I LOVE Gundam, Macross, Star Wars, Lord Of The Rings, etc, 90% of the games I've played even since the advent of E.T. on the Atari 2600 have sucked. Hopefully this trend will change. Now, if the license was handled by a reputable developer (i.e. Bioware) then maybe I will buy it, but it would have to be something I know I would play 5 years from now. Unfortunately, most owners of the property or universe will more or less use the leverage the license to sell their games (i.e. Rugrats). I also lean away from platform and puzzle games unless they provide a unique and memorable experience (Puzzle Fighter). Again, it has to have replay value. Like fine wine, if the game ages well, I will buy it.
|
Brought to you by smbius on Tuesday, May 25, 2004 (UMST)
|